Starlight
2026-03-04·10 min read

Pharmacy Claims API Comparison: Starlight vs the Rest

If you need to submit pharmacy claims programmatically, you have three broad options: direct switch integration, a PBM-focused platform like TransactRx, or a developer-first API like Starlight. Each approach has different tradeoffs in setup time, cost, flexibility, and developer experience. This guide breaks them down honestly.

Option 1: Traditional pharmacy switches

Companies like RelayHealth (Change Healthcare/Optum), Rx Linc, and SSI Group are the backbone of pharmacy claim routing. They've been doing this for 30+ years.

ProtocolNative NCPDP D.0 binary. You build the encoder/decoder.
ConnectivityVPN, leased line, or internet (varies by switch). Dedicated IP whitelisting.
Setup time3–6 months minimum. Contract negotiation, NCPDP certification, connectivity setup, payer testing.
Pricing$0.05–$0.07 per claim. Volume discounts available. Monthly minimums common.
SupportEnterprise sales process. Dedicated account managers for large customers. Limited self-serve tooling.
SandboxTest environments available but often require separate contracts. Not self-serve.

Best for:

  • • Established pharmacy chains with dedicated engineering teams
  • • Organizations that already have NCPDP expertise in-house
  • • High-volume operations (50K+ claims/month) where per-claim cost matters most
  • • Companies that need direct control over the entire claim lifecycle

Not ideal for:

  • • Startups or small teams without NCPDP experience
  • • Companies that need to ship quickly (MVP in weeks, not months)
  • • Software vendors building claims as a feature (not the core product)

Option 2: TransactRx

TransactRx operates as a cloud-based claims clearinghouse and PBM platform. They offer a REST API for eligibility and claims, primarily targeting discount Rx card programs, copay assistance programs, and private-label PBMs.

Getting started with TransactRx is not straightforward. There is no public signup, no sandbox you can try, and no documentation you can read before committing. You start by contacting their sales team, then go through a qualification process where they evaluate whether your use case fits their platform. From there, expect contract negotiation, onboarding calls, and a multi-week integration timeline before you can submit your first test claim. For companies that need to move fast or just want to evaluate the technology, this creates a significant barrier to entry.

ProtocolREST API (JSON/XML). Higher-level abstraction than raw NCPDP, but oriented toward PBM operators rather than general developers.
ConnectivityStandard HTTPS. No VPN required.
Getting startedContact sales → qualification call → contract negotiation → onboarding → integration support. No self-serve path. Expect 2-4 weeks minimum before you can write any code.
Setup time2-4 weeks after contract is signed. Includes onboarding, credential provisioning, and integration support.
PricingCompletely opaque. No public pricing page. Per-transaction model, but you won't know the numbers until you talk to sales and sign an agreement.
Target marketPBM operators, discount card administrators, copay program managers. Not general-purpose developer tooling.
DocumentationLocked behind contract. You cannot evaluate the API, read endpoint specs, or see request/response formats until after you've signed. This makes it impossible to estimate integration effort upfront.
SandboxNot publicly available. Test environments are provisioned after onboarding, not before.

Best for:

  • • Companies building or operating a PBM
  • • Discount card programs that need full adjudication capabilities
  • • Organizations that want a turnkey PBM platform, not just a claims API

Not ideal for:

  • • Developers who want to evaluate the API before committing to a sales process
  • • Startups that need to move fast and can't wait weeks for access
  • • POS/PMS vendors who just need claims routing (not PBM functionality)
  • • Teams that prefer self-serve, documentation-first integration
  • • Anyone who wants to know pricing before getting on a call

Option 3: Starlight API

Starlight is the first developer-first JSON REST API purpose-built for NCPDP pharmacy claims. The design philosophy: make NCPDP D.0 feel like any other modern API.

ProtocolJSON REST API. Standard HTTP methods, Bearer/API key auth, structured error responses. Feels like Stripe or Twilio, not healthcare.
ConnectivityStandard HTTPS. No VPN, no dedicated lines, no IP whitelisting.
Setup timeMinutes. Self-serve signup, instant API key, sandbox available immediately. No sales call required.
PricingTransparent: Free sandbox → $50/claim (instant access, no NPI) → $0.75/claim + $299/mo (bring your NPI) → custom enterprise from $0.10/claim.
DocumentationPublic and detailed. Code examples, API reference, blog tutorials. Evaluate before you commit.
SandboxFree, unlimited test claims. Full API surface. No credit card required. Simulated PBM responses for all transaction types.
Unique featureInstant Access tier: submit real claims using Starlight's NPI. No pharmacy license needed. Ideal for discount card startups and eligibility-first products.

Best for:

  • • Startups building pharmacy-adjacent products (discount cards, eligibility tools, POS systems)
  • • Developers who want to integrate claims without learning NCPDP
  • • Teams that need to ship an MVP quickly and iterate
  • • Companies without a pharmacy license (Instant Access tier)
  • • Anyone who values self-serve documentation and transparent pricing

Not ideal for:

  • • Organizations that need to operate as a PBM (TransactRx is more appropriate)
  • • Very high-volume operations (100K+ claims/month) where $0.05/claim switch pricing is critical (though Starlight's enterprise tier starts at $0.10)

Side-by-side comparison

Data format
Switches: NCPDP D.0 binary
TransactRx: REST (JSON/XML)
JSON REST API
Self-serve signup
Switches: ❌ Sales process
TransactRx: ❌ Sales process
✅ Instant
Free sandbox
Switches: ❌ / Limited
TransactRx: ❌ After contract
✅ Unlimited
Public documentation
Switches:
TransactRx:
Time to first claim
Switches: 3–6 months
TransactRx: 2–4 weeks
Minutes
NCPDP knowledge required
Switches: ✅ Extensive
TransactRx: Moderate
❌ None
NPI required
Switches:
TransactRx:
❌ Optional (Instant Access)
Per-claim cost (production)
Switches: $0.05–$0.07
TransactRx: Custom
$0.10–$50 (tier dependent)
B1 Billing
Switches:
TransactRx:
B2 Reversal
Switches:
TransactRx:
E1 Eligibility
Switches:
TransactRx:
PBM/adjudication platform
Switches: ❌ (routing only)
TransactRx:
❌ (routing only)

What about Stedi?

Stedi is often mentioned in the same breath as modern healthcare APIs. They're excellent: developer-first, great documentation, transparent pricing. But there's an important distinction:

Stedi focuses on medical claims (X12 837/835) and eligibility (X12 270/271). These are the ANSI X12 standards used by hospitals, physicians, and medical facilities. Pharmacy claims use a completely different standard: NCPDP Telecommunication D.0. Stedi does not process NCPDP transactions. If you need pharmacy claims (B1/B2/E1), Stedi isn't the right tool. If you need medical claims, Stedi is excellent and Starlight isn't the right tool.

Making the decision

The right choice depends on where you are and what you're building:

You're a startup building a discount card, eligibility tool, or pharmacy-adjacent product

Start with Starlight. Ship your MVP in days, not months. Upgrade to Growth tier when volume warrants it.

You're a POS/PMS vendor adding claims to your platform

Starlight as middleware eliminates the NCPDP learning curve. Your engineers focus on POS features, not protocol encoding.

You're building or operating a PBM

TransactRx is purpose-built for this. You need adjudication capabilities, not just claims routing.

You're an established pharmacy chain with NCPDP expertise

Direct switch integration gives you the lowest per-claim cost and maximum control. You have the team to handle it.

You're not sure yet, just exploring

Start with Starlight's free sandbox. Test the API, understand the data model, then decide your long-term architecture.

Related guides

Try the API, no commitment needed

Free sandbox, public docs, no sales call. Submit your first test claim in minutes and see if Starlight is the right fit.